36. Identify the correct sequence of marketing approach in
relation to advertising and public relations.
(A)
Product knowledge, prospecting, approach decision, establishing needs
(B)
Establishing needs, product knowledge, approach decision, prospecting
(C)
Prospecting, establishing needs, approach decision, product knowledge.
(D)
Approach decision, prospecting, product knowledge, establishing needs.
Answer:-
A
These are step wise.
1. Firstly
you should have the product knowledge. What you want to sell? What your product
is?
An understanding of a good
or service that might include having acquired information about its
application, function, features, use and support requirements. A business sales
representative is an example of an individual that is typically expected to
acquire considerable product knowledge about the goods and services that they
are responsible for selling to consumers.
2. Then is prospecting which
means the search for potential customers or buyers. You have to search
customers for your product in order to sell.
3. Then the decision to
approach to the customer in order to demonstrate your product and sell it to
him/her.
4. Then the final step is
establishing needs. The
organization that can understand why customers make decisions such as such as who buys, what they buy and how they buy will, by catering more closely
for customers satisfaction and needs, become potentially more successful.
37. The correct sequence in the communication process is
(A)
Selection, attention, perception, retention
(B)
Attention, selection, retention, perception
(C)
Selection, retention, perception, attention
(D)
Perception, attention, selection, retention
Answer:-
D
Consider
a smoker. He has a perception of smoking and various smoking brands. When he watches advertisement
about cigarettes on Television then he give them attention. Various brands
are advertised and he remind and select some good brands and then go to a shop and there a problem occurs. He remember only
one brand (retention) and buy it. In this cycle the communication process
occurs. So option D is correct.
38. Identify the correct sequence of the following
statutes:
(A) The
Press and Registration of Books Act, the Indian Telegraph Act, the Indian Penal
Code, the Indian Post Office Act.
(B) The
Indian Post Office Act, the Indian Telegraph Act, the Press and Registration of
Books Act, the Indian Penal Code
(C) The
Indian Telegraph Act, the Indian Post Office Act, the Press and Registration of
Books Act, the Indian Penal Code
(D) The
Indian Penal Code, the Press and Registration of Books Act, the Indian
Telegraph Act, the Indian Post Office Act
Answer:-
D
Indian
Penal Code (IPC, Hindi: भारतीय दण्ड संहिता) is the main criminal code
of India. It is a comprehensive code, intended to cover all substantive aspects
of criminal law. It was drafted in 1860 and came into force in British India
during the early British Raj period in 1862.
The
publication of newspapers is regulated primarily by the Press and Registration
of Books Act, 1867. The Act seeks to regulate the operation of printing presses
and newspapers and registration and preservation of copies of such newspapers.
The
Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 is a law in India that governs the use of
telegraphy, phones, communication, radio, telex and fax in India. It gives the
Government of India exclusive privileges of establishing, maintaining and
working telegraphs. It also authorizes the government to tap phone lines under
appropriate conditions. The act came into force on October 1, 1885.
In 1866
the Post Office Act was enacted which was subsequently amended by Act III of
1882 and Act XVI of 1896.
39. Identify
the correct sequence of chronological order of the following newspapers that
were launched during freedom movement:
(A)
Bombay Herald, Madras Courier, Madras Gazette, Asiatic Mirror
(B)
Asiatic Mirror, Bombay Herald, Madras Courier, Madras Gazette
(C)
Madras Courier, Bombay Herald, Asiatic Mirror, Madras Gazette
(D)
Madras Gazette, Madras Courier, Bombay Herald, Asiatic Mirror
Answer:-
C
1785
|
Madras Courier
|
English
|
Madras
|
British India
|
Published
weekly at first from 1785-10-12 to around 1818, with government sanction. Its
proprietor was Richard Johnson.
|
1789
|
Bombay Herald
|
English
|
Bombay
|
British India
|
Published
weekly from 1789 to 1792. Its proprietors are unknown.
|
1788
|
The Asiatic
Mirror and Commercial Advertiser
|
English
|
Calcutta
|
British India
|
Published
weekly at first from 1788-02 to 1820-05. Its proprietors were C.K. Bruce and
Dr. Shoolbred.
|
Madras Gazette
Published in Madras: 1 January - 28 February 1795
Here it’s masthead:-
Madras Courier newspaper:-
Asiatic mirror masthead:-
40. Identify the correct sequence of sales steps a PR person should know.
(A)
Creation of confidence, Interest, attention, selling the product
(B)
Selling the product, attention, interest, creation of confidence
(C)
Attention, selling the product, interest, creation of confidence
(D)
Attention, Interest, creation of confidence, selling the product
Answer: -
D
It is an
easy question.
A Public
Relation person first gain attraction of its customers towards his/her product
by advertising and then creates interest of the customers in that product. Then
he will create confidence in them of buying that product and finally sell it to
them.
For
example:- Hum ek surf kharidna chahte hain to hum tv pe surf ki ads ke taraf
dhyan dete hain. Dheere dheere unme se ek ad. Me hamara interest bn jata hai.
Fir ad. Aapne dekhe he hai d”daag gayab” , “daag ache lgte hain”, “safai
dhinchak”. Ye sb use kiye jate hain taki company wale hum customer log mein ek
confidence paida kar sken ki definitely I will help us and then finally hum
unke jaal me gir kar o product kharid lete hain.
41. Match
List – I with List – II:
List – I List – II
(Name) (Area)
a. Volney
B. Palmer 1. New Journalism
b. Tim
Berners-Lee 2. Advertising
c. Joseph
Pulitzer 3. Web
d. D.W.
Griffith 4. Film
Codes :
a b c d
(A) 2 3 1 4
(B) 3 2 1 4
(C) 4 3 1 2
(D) 3 2 4 1
Answer:-
A
Volney B.
Palmer opened the first American advertising agency, in Philadelphia in 1850.
This agency placed ads produced by its clients in various newspapers.
Sir Timothy
John "Tim" Berners-Lee (born 8 June 1955), also known as
"TimBL", is a British computer scientist, best known as the inventor
of the World Wide Web.
Joseph
Pulitzer (April 10, 1847 – October 29, 1911), born Pulitzer József, was a
Hungarian-American Jewish newspaper publisher of the St. Louis Post Dispatch
and the New York World. Pulitzer introduced the techniques of "new
journalism" to the newspapers he acquired in the 1880s.
David
Llewelyn Wark "D. W." Griffith (January 22, 1875 – July 23, 1948) was
an American film director, mostly remembered as the director of the 1915 film
The Birth of a Nation and the subsequent film Intolerance (1916).
42. Match List – I with List – II:
List – I List – II
(Concept) (Author)
a. W.W.
Rostow 1. Entropy
b.
Shannon & 2.
Evolutionary Perspective
Weaver
c.
Marshal 3. Growth theory
McLuhan
d.
Herbert Spencer 4. Medium is the
message
Codes :
a b c d
(A)
3 1 4
2
(B)
1 4 2
3
(C)
2 3 1
4
(D)
2 3 4
1
Answer:-
A
Walt Whitman Rostow (also
known as Walt Rostow or W.W. Rostow) (October 7, 1916 – February 13, 2003) was
a United States economist and political theorist who served as Special
Assistant for National Security Affairs to U.S. President Lyndon B. Johnson in
1966–69.
Rostow is
known for his book The Stages of
Economic Growth: A Non-Communist Manifesto (1960), which was used in
several fields of social science.
The Shannon–Weaver model of communication
has been called the "mother of all models." It embodies the concepts
of information source, message, transmitter, signal, channel, noise, receiver,
information destination, probability of error, encoding, decoding, information
rate, channel capacity, etc. Shannon
developed information entropy as a
measure for the uncertainty in a message while essentially inventing what
became known as the dominant form of "information theory."
"The medium is the message" is a phrase coined by Marshall
McLuhan meaning that the form of a medium embeds itself in the message,
creating a symbiotic relationship by which the medium influences how the
message is perceived.
Herbert Spencer (27 April 1820
– 8 December 1903) was an English philosopher, biologist, anthropologist,
sociologist, and prominent classical liberal political theorist of the
Victorian era.
Spencer
developed an all-embracing conception of
evolution as the progressive development of the physical world, biological
organisms, the human mind, and human culture and societies.
Spencer
first articulated his evolutionary
perspective in his essay, 'Progress: Its Law and Cause', published in
Chapman's Westminster Review in 1857, and which later formed the basis of the
First Principles of a New System of Philosophy (1862).
43. Match List – I with List – II:
List – I List – II
(Book) (Author)
a.
Crystallizing Public Opinion 1. Sandra Oliver
b. The
Power of Corporate Communication
2. Edward L. Bernays
c.
Effective public relations 3. Scott M.Cutlip
d. Public
Relations Strategy 4. Paul A.
Argenti
Codes :
a
b c d
(A)
4 2 3
1
(B)
3 2
1 4
(C)
2 4 3
1
(D)
1 3 2
4
Answer:-
C
EDWARD BERNAYS was a press
agent and public relations consultant to many clients, including Presidents
Woodrow Wilson and Calvin Coolidge, the American Tobacco Company, General
Electric, Alcoa, the American Dental Association, Dodge Motors, the NAACP, and
many others. In 1923 wrote Crystallizing
Public Relations, which provided principles and practices for an emerging
profession. At New York University, he taught the first college course in
public relations.
The Power of Corporate Communication: Crafting the Voice and Image of Your Business
by Paul Argenti (Author), Janis Forman
(Author)
Scott Munson Cutlip (July
15, 1915 in Buckhannon, West Virginia - August 18, 2000 in Madison, Wisconsin)
was a pioneer in public relations education. In 1952 he co-wrote the first
edition of Effective Public Relations
with Allen H. Center.
Public Relations Strategy A book by
Sandra M Oliver (Author)
44. Match List – I with List – II :
List – I List – II
(Director)
(Film)
a. Ketan
Mehta 1. Jaane Bhi Do Yaaron
b. Kundan
Shah 2. Aarth
c. Mahesh
Bhatt 3. Parinda
d. Vidhu
Vinod Chopra 4. Mirch Masala
Codes :
a
b c
d
(A) 4 1
2 3
(B) 1 2 4 3
(C) 4 2 3 1
(D) 3 4 2 1
Answer:-
A
Mirch Masala (Spices in
English) is a 1987 Hindi film directed by Ketan
Mehta.
Jaane Bhi Do Yaaro
(Devnagari: जाने भी दो यारों, English: Just Let It Go, Friends) is a 1983 Hindi film directed by Kundan Shah and produced by NFDC. It is
a dark satire on the rampant corruption in Indian politics, bureaucracy, news
media and business, and stars an ensemble cast that includes the likes of
Naseeruddin Shah, Ravi Baswani, Om Puri, Pankaj Kapur, Satish Shah, Satish Kaushik,
Bhakti Barve and Neena Gupta.
Arth (Hindi: अर्थ, in Meaning) is a 1982 film directed by Mahesh Bhatt, starring Shabana Azmi, Kulbhushan Kharbanda, Smita
Patil, Raj Kiran and Rohini Hattangadi. It features a memorable soundtrack by
Ghazal duo, Jagjit Singh and Chitra Singh.
Parinda (Hindi: परिंदा, English: The Bird) is an award-winning 1989 Indian crime drama film
directed and produced by Vidhu Vinod
Chopra. It is considered by many to be the turning point in reality in
Hindi cinema, as the theme of the film discusses the real life of Indian
underworld gangsters and the general life of residents in the city of Mumbai.
The film stars Jackie Shroff, Anil Kapoor, Nana Patekar and Madhuri Dixit in
the lead roles. It won two National Film Awards and five Filmfare Awards, and
was India's official entry for the 1990 Academy Award for Best Foreign Language
Film.The movie was titled Kabutarkhana but later changed and release as
Parinda.
45. Match
List – I with List – II :
List – I List – II
(Author) (Models)
a. Preparation,
Implementation, Impact Model
1. Lindermann
b. Three
step yardstick model 2.
Watson & Noble
c.
Pyramid Model
3. Cutlip, Center & Broom
d. Short
term and continuing programme model
4. McNamara
Codes :
a b
c d
(A) 2
4 1 3
(B) 3 2
4 1
(C) 4 1
2 3
(D) 3 1
4 2
Answer: -
D
We will
study this in detail: -
Preparation, Implementation, Impact Model
Cutlip, Center and Broom’s PII Model, outlined in their widely used text, Effective Public
Relations,
takes its name from three levels of research which they term “preparation, implementation
and impact”.
Specific
research questions arise at each step in the PII Model, illustrated in Figure
below. Answering these questions with research contributes to increased
understanding and adds information for assessing effectiveness. Noble and
Watson (1999) explain: “The bottom rung (step) of preparation evaluation
assesses the information and strategic planning; implementation evaluation considers
tactics and effort; while impact evaluation gives feedback on the outcome”.
A
noteworthy and pioneering element of the PII Model was the separation of
outputs from impact or outcomes and identification that these different stages
need to be researched with different methods. Also, identification of the steps
of communication – and, therefore, what should be measured at each stage or
level – is useful in guiding practitioners.
However,
the PII Model does not prescribe methodologies, but “assumes that programs and campaigns
will be measured by social science methodologies that will be properly funded
by clients/employers” (Noble & Watson, 1999). Perhaps this is easier said
than done.
PR Effectiveness Yardstick Model or Three step
yardstick model
Respected
US practitioner and researcher, Walter Lindenmann, has proposed an approach to research
and evaluation based on three levels of sophistication and depth, rather than
the chronological process of communication from planning through implementation
to achievement of objectives.
Lindenmann
sees level one as evaluation of
outputs such as measuring media placements or impressions (total audience
reached).
He terms level
two ‘Intermediate’ and describes this level as measuring comprehension,
retention, awareness and reception.
Level three is described as
‘Advanced’ and focuses on measuring opinion change, attitude change or, at the
highest level, behavioural change.
Level One
output evaluation is the low cost, basic level, but even this should be “more
detailed than counting up media clippings or using ‘gut reactions’ which are
informal judgments lacking any rigour in terms of methodology”, Noble and
Watson (1999) explain.
Intermediate
measurement criteria in Lindenmann’s PR Effectiveness Yardstick introduce a possible
fourth stage of communication – outgrowths, also referred to as out-takes by
Michael
Fairchild
(as cited in Noble & Watson, 1999, p. 13.). This stage refers to what
audiences receive or ‘take out’ of communication activities. Several academics
and researchers support identification of this additional stage in
communication after inputs and outputs because, before audiences change their
opinion, attitudes or behaviour, they first have to receive, retain and
understand messages.
They
point out that outgrowths or out-takes are cognitive and suggest a different
term for behavioural impact.
However,
Lindenmann omits inputs as a stage in communication. He splits inputs into his intermediate
and advanced levels. Therefore, this model has the advantage of separating
cognitive and behavioural impact objectives, but it is not as clear that research
should begin before outputs are produced.
Like the
Cutlip et al. PII Model, Lindemann’s Effectiveness Yardstick does not specify
research methodologies to use. However, in accompanying text he broadly
outlines a mix of qualitative and quantitative data collection techniques such
as media content analysis at level one; focus groups, interviews with opinion
leaders and polling of target groups at level two and, at level three (advanced),
he suggests before and after polling, observational methods, psychographic
analysis and other social science techniques such as surveys (Noble &
Watson, 1999, p. 13).
In
presenting his model, Lindenmann (1993) supports the concept of a “cluster of
technologies”
(Dozier,
1984) or “menu” of methodologies (Macnamara, 1992) for PR research, saying:
… It is
important to recognize that there is no one simplistic method for measuring PR
effectiveness. Depending upon which level of effectiveness is required, an
array of different tools and techniques is needed to properly assess PR impact.
Pyramid Model of PR Research
A paper
titled ‘Evaluation: The Achilles Heel of the public relations profession’, an
MA thesis extract published in International Public Relations Review (Macnamara,
1992) and the 1994 International Public Relations Association (IPRA) Gold Paper
Number 11 built on the PIIModel, advocating recognition of communication
projects and programs in terms of inputs, outputs and outcomes and recommended
that each stage should be evaluated.
The
Pyramid Model of PR Research, a revised version of the Macro Model of PR
Evaluation, is intended to be read from the bottom up, the base representing ‘ground
zero’ of the strategic planning process, culminating in achievement of a
desired outcome (attitudinal or behavioural).
The
pyramid metaphor is useful in conveying that, at the base when communication
planning begins, practitioners have a large amount of information to assemble
and a wide range of options in terms of media and activities. Selections and
choices are made to direct certain messages at certain target audiences through
certain media and, ultimately, achieve specific defined objectives (the peak of
the program or project). The metaphor of a pyramid is also useful to symbolise
what I have argued for more than a decade – that is, more research should be
done at the beginning and in the early stages of communication than at the end.
In this
model, shown in Figure 18, inputs are the strategic and physical components of communication
programs or projects such as the choice of medium (eg. event, publication, Web,
etc), content (such as text and images), and decisions on format (eg. print or
electronic). Outputs are the physical materials and activities produced (ie.
media publicity, events, publications, intranets, etc) and the processes to
produce them (writing, design, etc). Outcomes are the impacts and effects of
communication, both attitudinal and behavioural.
Within
the pyramid, key steps in the communication process are shown, borrowing from
Cutlipet
al.
(1985). However, the Pyramid Model of PR Research goes one step further than
most other models discussed in this chapter and endeavours to be instructive
and practical by providing a list of suggested measurement methodologies for
each stage. The list of methodologies is not exhaustive, but Figure 18 shows a
quite extensive list of methods and tools available to practitioners to measure
at the various stages.
Of
particular note in this model also is the large number of research and
evaluation methodologies available to practitioners which are no cost or low
cost including:
Secondary data (ie. existing research) which can be accessed within the
organisation (eg. market research, employee surveys, customer complaints data,
etc) or externally from the Web, the media, research services such as
Lexis-Nexis, academic journals etc;
Advisory or consultative groups;
Online
‘chat rooms’ and other informal feedback mechanisms;
Unstructured and semi-structured interviews;
Readability tests on copy (eg. Fog Index, Dale-Chall, Flesch Formula, etc);
Pre-testing (eg. PDF files of proposed publications, mock-ups of Web pages,
proposed programs for events, etc);
Response mechanisms such as 1800 toll free numbers, competitions, or Web
visits, downloads, etc from Web statistics.
The
Pyramid Model of PR Research is theoretically sound but also practical in that
it suggests the highest level and most rigorous measurement possible, but
recognises that this will not always be feasible. By identifying a ‘menu’ of
evaluation methodologies at the communication practitioner’s disposal from
basic to advanced, or what David Dozier (1984) calls a “cluster of
technologies”, some evaluation is possible in every program and project. With
this approach, there is no excuse for having no research.
Feedback
loops are not shown on the Pyramid Model of PR Research, something which Noble and
Watson (1999) and Watson and Noble (2005) note, but it is implicit in this
model that findings from each stage of research are constantly looped back into
planning. Cutlip et al.’s stepped PII model and the Pyramid Model both suggest
that you do not proceed to the next step unless you have incorporated formal
and informal feedback gathered from the previous step. For instance, if early feedback
or formal measurement (such as pre-testing) finds that a selected medium is
inappropriate, no practitioner would reasonably proceed to distribution of
information using that medium – at least one would hope not.
The
Pyramid Model deliberately combines formative and evaluative research in the
belief that the two types of research must be integrated and work as a
continuum of information gathering and feedback in the communication process,
not as separate discrete functions. This fits with the “scientific management
of public relations” approach to research recommended by Glen Broom and David
Dozier (1990).
Unified Model of Evaluation or Short term and
continuing programme model
Drawing
on all previously developed and published models, Paul Noble and Tom Watson
went on to develop a more sophisticated model which they titled the Unified
Model of Evaluation as shown in Figure 21. This attempted to combine the best
of other models and produce a definitive approach.
The
Unified Evaluation Model identifies four stages in communication by adding
Lindenmann’s and Fairchild’s concept of out-takes or outgrowths to the
three-stage concept advanced by other models. Noble and Watson prefer to call
the four stages or levels Input, Output, Impact and Effect.
This
supports inputs and outputs thinking in other models, but separates outcomes
into two types: cognitive which they call impact, and behavioural which they
term effect.
Recognition
of the need for different research methodologies to measure cognitive and behavioural
outcomes is important, but it is not certain whether the substitution of terms
clarifies or confuses. In many cases, cognitive change such as increased
awareness or a change of attitude (which Noble and Watson call impact) can be
seen as an effect. Media effects theory (see Gauntlett, 2002; Lull, 2000; Neuendorf, 2002; Newbold et al., 2002)
certainly suggests changes to awareness and attitudes are effects. A case can
be made for the terminology used in all models and distinctions may be
splitting hairs rather than providing clarification for practitioners.
As with
many of the other models, research methodologies are not spelled out in the
Unified Model of Evaluation. Noble and Watson (1999) point out that “the
research methodology required should be governed by the particular research
problem in the particular circumstances that apply.
Consequently,
any listing would simply be a collection of likely approaches rather than
something of universal applicability”.
All
researchers would undoubtedly agree with Noble and Watson’s statement that
there are no universally applicable research methodologies. However, by not
attempting to list methodologies applicable to various stages of communication,
practitioners are left with theoretical frameworks and a lack of practical
information on what they can do to implement the theory.
The second paper ends here with five questions
of comprehension. Ab aap log kafi hushiyaar ho to aap ye 5 swal aasani se kr
skte ho so mujhe smjhane ki zarurat nahi.
Analysis
of IInd paper UGC NET Dec 2013 ends here.
***************************THE END**************************
Thanks a lot man, can you please provide me answer keys of net exams 2009-2011
ReplyDeleteAnd some question paper like net june15, dec14, june13??
check ugc net website.
DeleteSir.... Me apse bhut prabhaavit hun. Bhut acha collection hai. Sir hindi me material ke liye muje kya karna chaiya. Pls muje bataiyega.
ReplyDeleteThanks for your words. Hindi ke lie proper material nahe hai acha hai agar aap translate kr pade.
Delete